|
Perhaps
you've acquired your Russian-made Lubitel for it was the
least expensive way to enter the medium format arena, or
perhaps you couldn't quite force yourself low enough to
try a Holga or Diana? Whatever your reasoning, you've got
a camera with lots of possibilities....very simple, yet
with enough controls at your fingertips to satisfy most
photographic technophiles.
So why, you ask, is this Lubitel being mentioned on the
GAK site, a site flaunting to the adoring public the virtues
of total plasticdom? The reason is, from my perspective
anyway, that this camera is an extremely versatile piece
of photographic equipment! Yes, it's close to being disavowed
by some plastic users, for they claim it's too good with
it's glass optics and normal range of camera controls. But
we can work around these minor details, enjoy some of it's
value-added features, and still prove that these images
belong in the toy catagory. After all, the Lubi leaks light
too, and film sometimes finds an interesting path to the
take-up reel. This is still a toy camera.
I've ignored my Lubi's for nearly a year now to concentrate
on the joys of the Holga, and it's hard to put it down.
But I think over the next 6 months it's time to rediscover
these unique cameras, and I'll post some items from time
to time that you may be able to use if you're just starting
out. At least 5 other GAK folks are Lubitel owners, so I'm
looking forward to their contributions, too! Also check
excellant existing sources of information regarding the
Lubitel, such as
Andrew Davidhazy's site describing the alteration of
the Lubitel for panoramic photography. Check out David
Gingold's site with useful Lubi tips, and Mark
Berry's page that outlines some of the history of the
Lubitel.
Let's look at a few issues that may come up for a new
Lubitel owner....
Everything's backwards!!! If you've never used a
camera with a waist-level viewfinder before, this can be
somewhat confusing at first. Take your time, you'll get
used to it. It makes composing the photo a challenge, but
look at it this way...it will actually slow you down, and
force you to concentrate on what you are including in your
photograph. Consider this: it may improve your composition!
How do I know if this is focused? Well, the trick
is not to believe the crisp, clear portion of the viewfinder!
This is for composing your photo only. The dingy circle
in the middle is what you must concentrate on. Once you
accomplish this ability to accurately determine focus, it
is a distinct advantage over the Diana and Holga. Be prepared
to be chastised by a few toy-camera users for cheating.
What about film choices? Unlike the Diana or Holga,
your Lubi has a variable shutter speed (bulb to 1/250 sec)
and a wider range of aperatures (f/4.5 to f/22). This offers
you a far greater range of film choices to play with, but
if you'd like to get a unique look to your photos, try leaning
toward slower films (ISO 50-100) in order to shoot at maximum
aperature. Readily available are Kodak's Verichrome Pan
and TMax 100, Ilford's Delta 100 and Pan F Plus. Shooting
at f/4.5 gives your images a look that mimics the optics
used 100 years ago. I'll post some images illustrating the
Lubitels optical characteristics soon, but first, let's
compare images between a Diana, Holga, and Lubitel (see
sidebar). Note that while the Diana, Holga, and Lubitel
have virtually the same focal length lens, the Diana captures
a smaller part of the scene, for the image opening is only
4 cm square, rather than 6cm square with the Holga and Lubitel.
The reason the Holga frame is not square is the tape I've
placed inside to help minimize light flare (see Harv's tips).
Also, keep in mind that there is a great deal of lens variation
within each type of camera. If you have more than one of
any of these cameras for instance, they may never see the
same scene alike!
Which format should I use? Well, that's up to you
to determine whether to use the 6 x 4.5 insert or the stock
6 x 6 format. But, I will say this.....aren't you sick and
tired of almost everything you see being in that 2:3 rectangular
format? Give the square format a try, it's refreshing whether
you're used to shooting a rectangular format already, or
just starting out.
Remember, like any film using paper-backed 120 film, your
best bet to minimize fogging the film is to load carefully
in subdued light, or better yet, in a changing bag or darkroom.
Can I make my shots look more like the Diana or Holga? Why?
Get a Holga, or a Diana, they're a blast! Seriously, you
can do a few things to tone down the sharp look to your
photos. Again, try doing what you can to shoot at f/4.5.
You can also get an inexpensive UV filter, and coat it with
a very light coat of vaseline. Leave the center portion
of the filter uncoated, and experiment from there. You can
wipe off and redistribute the vaseline coating to your satisfaction.
You can get an idea of the effect by holding the filter
in front of your focusing lens (the upper one), but your
developed film will give you a more accurate test.
I've also changed the look of my Lubitel shots by exposing
film under the following conditions: shooting underwater....shooting
while swing dancing....shooting while chasing down a Diana
user after trying to put chewing gum on my lens (he didn't
know which of the lenses to put it on.....HA!)....shooting
while running from a freight train....shooting while running
from the Diana owner after he realized he outweighed me
by 40 pounds.
|
These were all taken from the
same perspective, on Kodak Tri-X Pan.
Diana

Holga
Lubitel
Note that while the Diana, Holga, and Lubitel have virtually
the same focal length lens, the Diana captures a smaller
part of the scene, for the image opening is only 4 cm
square, rather than 6cm square with the Holga and Lubitel.
The reason the Holga frame is not square is the tape
I've placed inside to help minimize light flare (see
Harv's tips). Also, keep in mind that there is a
great deal of lens variation within each type of camera.
If you have more than one of any of these cameras for
instance, they may never see the same scene alike!
View a gallery by Kurt Stepnitz |
|