Advertisement

Vintage

Something Different for Joomla

Diana+ Review PDF Print E-mail
Written by Michael Barnes   
Saturday, 15 March 2008

 

diana-023_home.jpg

This is an exciting time for toy camera enthusiasts. A new breed of toy cameras is emerging from dark shaded places around the world, a place where strange people must actually think that film cameras still can sell. But of course these aren’t your regular film cameras, they are toy cameras—targeted to the young, hip rebels of the photography world.

 

 

 

diana-023.jpg

(Taken from issue 8 of Light Leaks magazine, ) 

The one that has gotten the biggest buzz is Lomography’s "update" on the Diana camera. Did Lomography find the infamous Great Wall Plastic Company factory, brush off the dust and get the plant rolling again? No, but they have taken the original Diana camera and emulated it very well and thrown in some new features that will be welcomed by most enthusiasts.

The overall build and design of the Diana+ is meant to imitate the original design as close as possible. From a few feet, one wouldn’t be able to tell the difference between a Diana and a Diana+. Upon closer inspection, you notice some of the Lomography branding on the top of the winding knob and a red logo on the bottom of the camera, but certainly nothing that ruins the overall design for the original Diana lovers.

diana-027.jpg

The lens barrel name plate reads "Diana+" in the same font as the original, except thinner. The distance icons have changed a little, and the measurements on my test model were using meters as its measurement.

One of the first things that caught my attention as I opened the bubble wrap was the entire lens housing was loose when I picked it up, and actually fell off! Luckily I was holding it over the table at the time and no damage was done.

diana-030.jpg

The Diana+ has a completely removable lens that twists off, similar to removable lenses on an SLR camera; it even has dots that line up for you. I had difficulties with this at first because unlike a heavier SLR lens, the plastic is very light and fragile so a delicate handling is required. It actually seemed to fit together quite well, the final twist when attaching the lens will give you a definite "snap" affirming the lens is locked in place

The removable lens serves the best feature of this camera, a pinhole function. Remove the lens and activate the "P" on the aperture lever and presto! You’re pinholing! Just remember to not leave the lens housing on when using the pinhole feature (unless you’re in an experimental mood).

 

The removable lens and pinhole feature is most likely the suspect to a slightly elongated distance from the shutter to the end of the lens, about an eight of an inch. I wonder if this effects the optics in any way as there doesn’t appear to be any correction for this...

Another great feature about the Diana+ is the ability to shoot both a 4x4 format as well as a 6x6 format. From the back of the camera, any Holga owner will see the familiar manual lever to choose what size format you’d like to use. For 4x4 shooting, a mask (not supplied with my test camera) will have to be inserted, in which case you will want to move the switch to point to the "16", which is the standard size for the original Diana camera.

Another welcome feature to this camera (possibly unintended by its manufacturer) is the ability to disassemble the camera with ease, similar to a Holga. A simple screwdriver is all that is required to disassemble pretty much the entire camera. Even the lens housing is easily removed for anyone wanting to try out their own home-brew lenses.

diana-047.jpg

3 SCREWS REMOVE LENS HOUSING

One noticeable change from the original Diana is the mechanism that holds the film in place from the bottom of the camera. In the Diana+ version, there are two plastic arms that are meant to be bent slightly in order to get the film in place. I personally prefer the rocker arm mechanism of the original Diana, and the Diana+ version does require a bit more skill and delicate handling to align the film. I would also anticipate these rather flimsy pieces to break easily, although I really went to town on them for testing and did not break mine.

Lining up your film and shooting is not much different with the Diana+. I would have preferred some more stickiness of the "B/N" lever, which seemed loose on my model. I also questioned during shooting whether I had actually exposed a shot, as the sound of the shutter is much quieter than the original Diana. The aperture lever was nice and sticky and there was no question it would hold its position. Advancing film was normal and I had no difficulties unloading the film which yielded a tight roll of exposed film.

I took the normal precautions to prevent light leakage on my test model and had no leaking of light on my test rolls. In fact for one test shot, I removed all the tape and danced around in full sunlight for a few minutes and still no light leakage appeared on the film. (I was asked to stop dancing several times though...)

Overall, I found the handling of the Diana+ the same as the original Diana, as long as I was mindful of its differences in the features. I exposed four rolls of film through the Diana+, I’ll share my results.

For my testing I ventured out with both an original Diana and a Diana+. I loaded them up in the exact same way—400 speed film, and taped up to prevent Light Leaks. I did not have a film mask with my test version, so the results you will see will compare the 4x4 version of a shot in the original Diana to a 6x6 version of the shot in the Diana+.

In both my colour and black & white tests, I found a subject 8 feet ahead of me, as well as something else in the background at a greater distance and tried to get sky in the top corners. I shot the same subject with both cameras and used the same values on each camera, testing various apertures and focus settings.

Both film exposed well, but I was disappointed to find I wasn’t in the best lighting conditions to yield some of the more classic vignetting that Dianas are known for with either model. However, when looking at the 6x6 version of the Diana+ shots, you can certainly see the quick sharp fall off of light in the corners. You also get the film numbers burning in on the exposure as well, and obviously you get more subject exposed on film.

diana2_bw.jpg

ORIGINAL DIANA  ON CLOUDY, 6-12 FT

dianaplus2_bw.jpg

DIANA+  ON CLOUDY, 6-12 FT

diana5_bw.jpg

ORIGINAL DIANA SUNNY, 6-12 FEET

dianaplus_bw.jpg

DIANA+ SUNNY, 6-12 FEET

Most Diana users ebmrace the blur, however my shots yielded by the Diana+ lacked a "sweet spot" for focus. It may also be that the blur that does develop away from the middle does so in a different degree than the original Diana.

Overall the Diana+ offers the toy camera enthusiast more options than the original, and has balanced the original look with the new features very well, particularly the pinhole feature.

The Diana+ offers another great toy to add to one’s arsenal of toy cameras. The original Diana will always offer a sense of nostalgia and that "one-of-a-kind" feeling you get with each one, which is also evident in subtle differences in the photos they take. Chances are that every Diana+ will yield similar results with better quality control during the construction of the cameras.

Despite whether you want to love them or hate them, a new toy camera—a film one at that, is a good thing for toy camera enthusiasts.

 

Hits: 18854
Comments (0)Add Comment

Write comment

busy
Last Updated ( Friday, 06 February 2009 )
 
< Prev   Next >
Joomla Templates by JoomlaShack